Blogger Anonymity Upheld as Judge Refuses to Reveal ‘Orthomom’ Identity
In a striking victory for constitutional rights, a recent court decision has made it clear that First Amendment rights protect a writer operating under a pseudonym.
The New York State Supreme Court recently struck down a request in a lawsuit against Google to reveal the name of a blogger who writes under the name “Orthomom.” Lawrence County Schoolboard Trustee Pamela Greenbaum filed the suit against Orthomom, claiming that comments on her blog at orthomom.blogspot.com were “defamatory.”
According to reports, Greenbaum claimed that the writer of Orthomom called her a “bigot” and an “anti-semite.” In her decision, Judge Marcy Friedman first noted that the comments attributed to Orthomom were in fact posted by other bloggers and readers in the comments section of her blog, and then ruled that, regardless, the statements made were protected opinions, not defamatory comments.
More generally, Judge Friedman saw Greenbaum’s attempt to reveal the blogger’s true identity as an assault to constitutional rights. In her own words, she writes, “The relief sought by Greenbaum, on the eve of a school board election, would have a chilling effect on protected political speech.”
As Orthomom herself pointed out in a recent column in the Jewish Star, the Constitution has protected writers using pen names throughout U.S. history, including the writers of the Federalist papers, one of the most famous examples of American political critique.
With all of the confusion and outrage over the constitutional legitimacy of surveillance, wiretapping and torture that American governmental officials have been disclosing in recent months, it’s good to know that in some corners of the American legal landscape, the United States Constitution still remains unquestionable.






















November 20th, 2007 at 9:23 pm
Three cheers and a 21-gun salute to any Federal judge who will boldly step out and unequivocally protect free pseudonym speecth.
December 9th, 2007 at 9:58 am
Not only am I totally shocked that a judge would STILL rule FOR the constitutional rights of
Americans, I am equally shocked that a “Friedman” would rule against a “Greenbaum”.