<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Intoxilyzer, Same Old Source Code Battle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.totallawyers.com/blog/2008/11/30/new-intoxilyzer-same-old-source-code-battle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.totallawyers.com/blog/2008/11/30/new-intoxilyzer-same-old-source-code-battle/</link>
	<description>Learn about consumer law issues and connect with a lawyer</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The LAW &#38; LAWYERS Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ohio May Standardize Breathalyzer Testing</title>
		<link>http://www.totallawyers.com/blog/2008/11/30/new-intoxilyzer-same-old-source-code-battle/#comment-7379</link>
		<dc:creator>The LAW &#38; LAWYERS Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ohio May Standardize Breathalyzer Testing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.totallawyers.com/?p=152#comment-7379</guid>
		<description>[...] the continuing controversy and litigation surrounding the Intoxilyzer 8000, Ohio officials are considering purchasing 700 units in an effort to standardize breath test [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the continuing controversy and litigation surrounding the Intoxilyzer 8000, Ohio officials are considering purchasing 700 units in an effort to standardize breath test [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
